BRILLIANCE
+ ELOQUENCE + LOVE = GOLD |
No
members of the proletariat need apply for the bracelet in
the $5,000 (with rebuys) World Series of Poker No-Limit Deuce-to-Seven
Lowball Draw event.
The "Deuce," as most folks around here call it,
is and always has been an event for poker's aristocracy. If
the $5,000 entry fee isn't daunting enough, the availability
of $5,000 rebuys is. The game isn't played very often in modern
poker, except in very high limit side action. Only poker's
best and richest players bother to enter.
YOU CAN'T BUY THIS BRACELET
|
"The
fact is the fields are remarkably strong." |
|
|
Although I've heard some small bankroll players enviously
call this the "buy a bracelet" tournament, because
the fields are very small compared to other WSOP events (we
had 33 entrants today, and tournament assistant Robert Thompson,
Jr. thought that might be a record, as we had 30 last year),
the fact is the fields are remarkably strong (virtually any
starting table would make an outstanding final table for the
World Championship event), and no-limit deuce is, for reasons
we'll see as we get into the hand-by-hand analysis, a poker
game, not a card game.
Although there is luck in any poker game, it's much harder
for a weaker player to get "hit in the face with the
deck" in no-limit deuce, and so it's no surprise that
the final three players left can usually be found playing
in the same high stakes games at the Bellagio, and that this
year's winner is one of the most brilliant and eloquent men
in the world of high stakes poker, Howard Lederer.
The 33-player field made 43 rebuys, putting $380,000 in chips
into play for the 5-man final table. We started play today
with 49 minutes left on the clock, $500 antes, $1,500-3,000
blinds, and the following seats and chip counts:
Seat |
Player |
Chips |
1 |
James Hoeppner |
$6,000 |
2 |
Mark Weitzman |
$60,500 |
3 |
Freddie Deeb |
$123,500 |
4 |
Howard Lederer |
$120,500 |
5 |
Hertzel Zalewski |
$69,500 |
|
"The
Deuce is played no-limit, which dramatically increases
the skill level." |
|
|
On the surface, Deuce might seem similar to the game I chose
to skip for my off day, Ace-to-Five Lowball draw, but there
are some huge differences. First, the Deuce is played no-limit,
which dramatically increases the skill level over a limit
game, because bluffs and reads become a major factor, rather
than just pot odds and card math, and second, as the name
"Deuce-to-Seven" implies, the best possible low
is 2-3-4-5-7 offsuit.
Aces count as high cards, and straights and flushes count
as high hands, so when you're drawing at a hand like 3-4-5-6,
you don't have as many good cards to hit as you might think.
An ace is a brick, even worse than a king, and a two or a
seven give you a straight. Any seven low is a monster hand,
and any eight counts as pretty monstrous also.
A HIGH CLASS REUNION
Lederer, Deeb, and Weitzman are high stakes Bellagio regulars,
and Zalewski, a Houston player, is an extremely tough no-limit
player who comes into town regularly enough, and is usually
one of the players on whom you can get an individual price
in The Big One (i.e., he's considered amongst the top 20%
of the field). I was particularly familiar with his game because
he was part of the Murderer's Row I found myself staring at
in my first table in the 2000 Championship Event.
Only Hoeppner was an outsider, and not much of an outsider.
He plays a lot of high stakes poker too, he's just not quite
"one of the Bellagio boys," and with his extremely
short stack, he was the obvious target, especially as half
of his $6,000 starting stack went into the first pot as the
big blind.
|
"Be
sure you understand this isn't an 'insiders against an
outsider' strategy." |
|
|
Lederer made it $6,000 to go from the button, Zalewski called
from the small blind, and Hoeppner looked at his cards, the
$17,500 already in the pot, and decided to toss his last $2,500
in to contest it, even though he knew Lederer and Zalewski
were extremely likely to not bet at each other in an effort
to maximize their chances of knocking him out. Be sure you
understand this isn't an "insiders against an outsider"
strategy: it's just the best way to ensure you knock a player
out, and the ladder steps at this stage of the tournament
were worth a lot of cold, hard cash.
Lederer drew two, Zalewski and Hoeppner one each, and even
though Hoeppner caught an ace, both Lederer and Zalewski paired,
so Hoeppner was back in the game, more than tripled up.
THAT'S PAT JACK, NOT PAT SAJAK, I MUST SAY
He only lasted three more hands, though. He moved all-in
on #4, and Deeb called from the small blind. Hoeppner stayed
pat, Deeb drew, and as Deeb examined his draw, Hoeppner spread
his pat jack-low out on the table. He'd probably have preferred
to steal the blinds and antes, but a pat jack is better than
you think in this game.
With Deeb drawing one, the pat jack wins if Deeb catches
an ace, king, queen, jack with a worse kicker, or any pair.
That's 12 outs for the four aces, kings and queens, and 12
more for the cards that could pair Deeb, a minimum of 24 possible
wins against 28 possible losses, perhaps better than that
if Deeb was drawing at a hand like 2-3-5-6, where the fours
would also be losers, and hugely better if Deeb were drawing
at something like 3-4-5-6, where any A, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
Q, K or A would be a losing draw. Of course, for exactly that
reason, good Deuce players don't draw at hands like 3-4-5-6
very often.
OK, enough Deuce lessons. Deeb caught a nine for a 9-8 low,
and Hoeppner was gone.
JUST CALL HIM FAST FREDDIE
|
"I
felt someone was going to take a stand against this bullying." |
|
|
Four-handed, the blinds and antes represented $6,500 in dead
money, and Hassam "Freddie" Deeb, who had already
made two final tables in four tournaments entered at this
Series, was playing the role of "Fast Freddie" and
making a lot of raises to $9,000 to capture that dead money:
six uncontested raises in the first 15 hands. Just about the
time I felt someone was going to take a stand against this
bullying, sure enough, Lederer came over the top of him for
$25,000 more on hand 18, and Freddie let the hand go.
At the first break, I counted the chips at
Weitzman, $39,000
Deeb, $149,500
Lederer, $139,500
Zalewski, $52,000
When you're short stacked in no-limit, you have to find some
hands, especially when the blinds and antes are high enough
to eat away at your stack. With the new $1,000 antes and $2,000-4,000
blinds, it would cost a player $10,000 to sit out a round,
and a round now consisted of only four hands. The short stacks
were going to have to jump into the game fast, and everyone
knew it.
On the very first hand at after the break (#38 overall),
Zalewski made it $14,000 to go from the button, and Weitzman
pushed all-in from the small blind, a raise of $24,000. Zalewski
called. Weitzman stayed pat, Zalewski drew one, and Weitzman
turned over his J-10-8-6-2, a winner, as Zalewski, who had
been drawing at a seven low, paired his deuce, and was now
extremely short stacked.
A FAMILY POT CONSPIRACY
Three hands later, Lederer made it $8,000 to go under the
gun, and Zalewski pushed his last $11,000 all-in. Everyone
called the $11,000, as eager to use the check-down conspiracy
against Zalewski as Zalewski and Lederer had been to use it
against Hoeppner.
|
"The
Bellagio Boys were back in familiar territory." |
|
|
Weitzman and Deeb drew two each, Lederer stayed pat, and
Zalewski drew one. Everyone checked, and Deeb turned over
a 9-7. Lederer mucked his pat jack, and Zalewski stood up,
having paired one of his cards. He was out fourth at 5:25
p.m., and the Bellagio Boys were back in familiar territory,
playing shorthanded high stakes poker against one another.
It can get a little rough in these friendly little high stakes
games, as we found out four hands later, when Weitzman raised
it to $12,000 from the button, and Lederer, a fearsome physical
presence at 6'3", probably about 280 pounds, a dark beard
that's always trimmed at about two week's worth of growth,
and an iron jaw, called from the big blind.
Lederer drew two, a pretty sure sign he figured Weitzman
for an attempt to steal the blinds, and Weitzman drew one.
After the draw, Lederer checked, and Weitzman bet $25,000,
about half of his stack. Lederer considered for a while, and
decided to call, showing that he'd made 2-2-A-4-8, a low pair
with a bad kicker. Weitzman mucked his hand, obviously having
paired something bigger than a two. Lederer had picked off
a big bluff.
YEAH, AND I DOUBLE DOWN ON HARD 12, TOO
We had a brief comic moment when Deeb got confused about
how many cards Howard had drawn. "You drew one?"
Deeb asked.
"Yeah," Howard said, smiling, "I drew one
to this." He spread out 8-4-2-2 on the table. "No,
I guess that couldn't be it, I drew one to this," and
spread out A-8-4-2 on the table. "Guess you drew two,"
Freddie said, returning the smile.
Later, after Weitzman had been eliminated, I heard him and
Deeb discussing the play.
|
"If
he has a huge hand, he probably bets a little less." |
|
|
"He knows I've drawn two there, and probably haven't
hit anything gigantic, especially when I don't bet right out,"
Howard told Freddie. "Then he goes and makes a pot-sized
bet, one that's going to be tough to call without some sort
of hand. I figure he has to either have a huge hand or something
pretty bad, and if he has a huge hand, he probably bets a
little less, so he might get a call. I don't have to be right,
the analysis doesn't have to work out that way, but I just
wasn't willing to hand him all the money in that pot."
When you're playing shorthanded no-limit, and someone establishes
they can read you or figure you out that well, you're in a
lot of trouble, especially short-chipped, and Weitzman exited
eleven hands later, when he moved all-in for his last $17,000,
and both Deeb and Lederer called. Deeb drew one, Lederer stayed
pat, and Weitzman drew one.
Deeb and Lederer both checked after the draw, and Deeb showed
that he'd made another 9-8. Howard tossed away his pat queen,
and Weitzman showed the jack he'd caught. Weitzman was out
on hand 56, and we were heads-up at 5:45.
THE BELLAGIO BOYS FIGHT IT OUT
|
"If
Howard had a big hand, this was going to be a short tournament." |
|
|
Heads-up, the small blind goes on the button (SBB), and acts
first before the flop but last after the flop. For a moment,
it looked like we might have only one heads-up hand, because
Deeb raised it to $14,000 from the SBB, Lederer re-raised
$30,000 more, and Deeb almost immediately shoved his remaining
$150,000 all-in. If Howard had a big hand, this was going
to be a short tournament, but Lederer let it go, probably
unwilling to gamble all his chips on a draw. Deeb showed a
pat 10-8, and that he had plenty of speed and nerve.
At this point, with a timeout to get some of the smaller
chips off the table, I was able to get an accurate count.
After hand 58, Deeb led $258,500-$121,500, and we learned
why Howard Lederer hadn't been willing to gamble all his chips
on one big hand, as he started chopping away at Deeb, taking
the aggressor's role, and Deeb rarely found anything with
which he wanted to fight back.
WHY LOOK AT YOUR CARDS WHEN YOU KNOW YOUR MAN?
|
"I
don't even know why I looked!" |
|
|
On hand 72, Lederer made it $15,000 from the SBB, and Deeb
called. Lederer drew two, a clear sign he'd been on a steal
attempt, and Deeb drew one. Freddie bet $20,000 after the
draw, and Lederer immediately moved all-in on him. Deeb folded,
and as Howard collected the pot, he said, "I don't even
know why I looked (at his cards)." He'd figured Deeb
would move at him, after his two-card draw, and had already
planned on playing back. That's just another of those reasons
why no-limit Deuce is poker, and not a card game.
Lederer was now closer, trailing about $160,000-$220,000.
Hand 76 showed, perhaps better than any hand in the tournament,
how this really was an intramural affair. Lederer made it
$15,000 to go from the SBB, and Deeb called. Deeb drew two,
and Lederer drew one, and as Howard asked for the card, Deeb
laughed and launched into a long story about a live (money)
game that had happened two years before.
AND HEY, HOW ARE THE WIFE AND KIDS?
"I thought you were doing what this guy did," Deeb
said, as the dealer sat that and waited for the two players
to look at their cards. "This guy said, 'I have a good
drawing hand,' and then he stood pat, and I sat there and
thought, 'please don't let me catch a pair.' I caught a jack,
bet $9,000, he moved in on me, and I called him, won the pot,
and he went crazy, he couldn't believe I called him, but I
knew when he made the speech about having a good draw and
then stood pat he was making some kind of play, I thought
you were doing the same thing."
I may have missed a detail or two, but that was the essence
of Freddie's story, and as you can see, it took a while to
relate. The two players had just left their cards on the table
as they started talking about this live game from two years
ago, just as they might do when playing live heads-up poker.
Eventually they remembered they were in a tournament, Deeb
looked at his cards and checked, Lederer bet $40,000, and
Deeb folded.
A few hands later, Lederer's sister Katie showed up. I went
over to say hi, and heard her say something about a tuxedo,
and found out that Howard was getting married in a few weeks.
Katie is a New York journalist who is writing a book about
the poker playing Lederers (Howard's other sister is Annie
Duke), and Howard, who'd already made one final table, asked
tournament officials to swap out his XXL jacket for a medium
for Katie.
TIME FOR A FASHION STATEMENT
"Oh, I got one last year," she said. It must be
tough, getting souvenirs all the time from two of the world's
best players.
"These are suede," Howard said, and indeed he's
right, this year's jackets are indeed much spiffier.
"Oh, OK," she said. The atmosphere wasn't exactly
tense here.
She tried it on, and it fit pretty well. "It may not
be a designer cut," joked Howard about Katie and her
New York fashion sense, but she seemed happy with the present.
We got back to playing poker, and Lederer got back to chopping
away at Deeb, raising just a few more pots than Freddie was
raising, and very gradually, Howard moved into the chip lead.
Meanwhile, Lederer, whom I'd started to get to know a bit
at the Poker Million, started showing a little more of the
analytical mind that had impressed me twice at the Isle of
Man.
IF LEDERER IS SELLING, I'M BUYING
|
"Any
strategy designed to accumulate chips rather than survive
seemed correct." |
|
|
The first time came when he chose to be the only player in
the entire field to use his pink "rebuy" slip to
get his full $10,000 in chips onto the table from the start
(I always like to have more chips on the table than my opponents
in no-limit, in case I pick up a big hand, and in a tournament
with the structure like the Poker Million had, with almost
all of the money going to first place, any strategy designed
to accumulate chips rather than survive seemed correct to
me
but Lederer was the only player in the field who
seemed to think it through and play it that way).
The second time when we were at dinner and he was debating
Erik Seidel about the "viewing cards under the table
technology" that was in use at the Poker Million and
how while it would cost players something in terms of other
people learning how they played, they would get it all back,
and more, from the added money this exciting technology would
bring into poker.
I like the way this man thinks, and he made a terrific point
about Deuce as we approached hand 108.
A NEW GAME FOR THE MASSES?
"You know, this game would be great for that under-the-table
camera technology," he said. "Probably a lot better
than hold'em, because there would be none of the problems
of the audience figuring out how the cards fit the flop. It's
a pretty simple game to teach to non-players, the worst five
card hand wins."
In a flash, I realized he was exactly right. The reason why
draw poker, a completely dead game in the modern poker world,
works so well in the movies is that the viewing audience can
look at Bret Maverick's hand and see his royal flush draw.
There's none of this fitting a hand together with the flop
problem.
I like the way this man thinks.
We hit the next break, with the antes going to $1,500 and
the blinds to $3,000-6,000, with a chip count of Lederer $235,000,
Deeb $145,000.
Howard continued to grind away at Deeb, and Freddie finally
started playing back at him, re-raising on hands 119 and 122,
and each time, Lederer had to muck.
WHEN YA GOTTA GO, YA GOTTA GO
Lederer still had the lead on hand 127, when Deeb made it
$16,000 to go from the SBB, and Lederer almost immediately
re-raised a stunning $200,000. Deeb looked back at his hand,
and decided to call. If Lederer won, we were done, and if
Deeb won, he'd have a substantial chip lead.
Lederer drew one card, and so did Deeb. Because the action
was all-in, they turned the hands over: 7-6-4-2 for Lederer,
8-7-3-2 for Deeb.
"You look first," Deeb said. "If you make
it, I don't have to bother looking."
Lederer peeled back his hole card slowly, in that way that
professionals have of looking at part of a card, to see how
many pips they can see. Howard could see this card didn't
have many pips on it.
He turned over the five of spades, and the tournament was
over. Deeb looked anyway, his draw irrelevant with Lederer
holding a made seven, and found he'd caught an ace.
THE MISREAD DIDN'T MATTER
"I thought I had a pat eight when I first raised,"
Deeb said. "I misread my hand, but it's the same thing,
I'm going to raise to $16,000 whether I have a pat eight or
a draw to an eight. I looked before I called the big raise,
though, and decided this was a hand I had to go with."
Lederer smiled. "If the queen in my hand was a jack,
you would have won," he said, meaning that if he'd held
J-7-6-4-2, he'd have stood pat, and Deeb would have caught
the five to give him an eight low.
Deeb seemed pretty calm afterwards, for a guy who had just
lost what amount to a $73,720 dollar pot (the difference between
first and second).
OH, HECK, $73,720, IT'S ONLY MONEY
"We know each other pretty good, we're good friends,"
he said, "so it's no big deal who wins, it's the same,
we each have a bracelet already, I don't care about the title,
I just wanted to win the money, and it's just money, and he's
a nice guy." Ah, the life of the high stakes Bellagio
Boys.
Suzie Weiss, the swing shift manager at the Bellagio poker
room, whom Howard will be marrying June 2, would agree with
Freddie's "nice guy" assessment, I guess, and there
wasn't anything in Howard's post-game comments that indicated
anything else.
|
"It's
not like I was expecting a soft final table in this tournament." |
|
|
"He (Deeb) is a challenge, he's got speed in his game,"
Lederer said. "The whole table was tough, most of these
guys play a lot more live Deuce than I do, and Mark Weitzman
was the guy who taught me how to play this game in the first
place, but it's not like I was expecting a soft final table
in this tournament, anyway. I'm a better limit hold'em player,
but I must have something going in this game, I've played
it in seven tournaments and won four of them (he won in back
to back years at the Hall of Fame tournament, 1994-95), obviously
I'm running lucky to win that many times, but I must be playing
it OK too."
Seeing as how last year's Deuce winner, Jennifer Harman,
got married about six months after the 2000 World Series,
and this year's winner is getting married about two weeks
after the 2001 Series ends, I guess the formula for winning
the WSOP's #2 glamour event is becoming more clear: Play a
lot of high stakes poker against the best players in the world,
and fall in love with something other than your cards. After
all, as Howard Lederer proved today, this game has a lot more
to do with getting inside the other guy's head than it does
with drawing the right tickets. Poker's aristocracy wouldn't
have it any other way.
Final Results, $5,000 Buy-in No-Limit Deuce-to-Seven (Rebuys)
33 Entries, 43 rebuys, total prize pool $368,600
1. Howard Lederer |
$165,870 |
2. Freddie Deeb
|
$92,150 |
3. Mark Weitzman |
$55,290 |
4. Hertzel Zalewski
|
$36,860 |
5. James Hoeppner
|
$18,430 |
And now, for those of you who just can't get enough World
Series poker
.
|
To the Top |
THE
MAN WHO NEVER LOSES
|
We had a second final table at the World
Series of Poker today, the $1,000 No-Limit Hold'em Senior's
Championship. To qualify as a "senior," you
had to be at least 50 years old. Funny, I can remember when
I thought 25 was old, and now I qualify to play in the Senior's
tournament in five years.
The two events today were playing out simultaneously, and
because the Deuce-to-Seven is an Open event, where anyone
with the nerve and buy-in can play, but the Senior's eliminates
many of the world's best players, I choose to cover the
Deuce to conclusion, and moved over to the Senior's tournament
only when the Deuce was done.
There were about 20 minutes left before the 8:00 dinner
break, so I decided to not to try to figure out the jumble
of confusion in front of me, and to return when the dinner
break was over. Why a jumble of confusion, you say? The
Senior's is "Oklahoma Johnny" Hale's pet baby.
It has been held in a number of different venues, and this
was the first time it was being offered as a WSOP event.
HOW MANY LORDS A LEAPING?
Johnny decided to go all-out, with a special felt that
was ringed with the names of all the players in his "Senior's
Hall of Fame," the flags of all the nations in the
world and I think a few nations that don't exist anymore,
seven or eight different "Senior's No-Limit Championship"
logos, a partridge, and a pair tree. That was nothing. You
should have seen the table before they got started. There
were so many different kinds of commemorative items on display,
one wag told me that "it looked like a garage sale."
|
"The
colors were non-standard." |
|
|
The commemorative items were removed before play began,
but they weren't using standard WSOP chips. Instead, Johnny
had had special Senior's Championship chips created, and
the colors were non-standard, with some of them a bit close
in color, like the orange $1,000 chips and the orange-pink
$5,000 chips. One of the players, who didn't want his name
used, told me he thought the chips were playing tricks on
his eyes, and that it made it very difficult to figure out
who had how much money or who was betting what.
"In the future, I hope Johnny makes the table a bit
less busy," the final tablist said, "but the important
thing is that he's trying so hard to make this all special.
He really went all-out, I can't blame him for trying."
When the actual ten-player final table began, the seats
and chip positions were:
Seat |
Player |
Chips |
1 |
Mike Cox |
$18,100 |
2 |
Steve Kaufman |
$28,200 |
3 |
Phyllis Meyers |
$10,900 |
4 |
Jay Heimowitz |
$80,000 |
5 |
Gary Pollak |
$73,700 |
6 |
Pat Burke |
$3,500 |
7 |
Scott Mayfield |
$17,900 |
8 |
Larry Murphy |
$10,100 |
9 |
Norm Ketchum |
$59,000 |
10 |
George Rodis |
$69,000 |
When I joined the fray after the Seniors returned from
their dinner break, they had moved Johnny's special felt
over to the normal final table area (they'd been out in
the middle of the room while the Deuce was finishing), and
the seats and chip positions among the six remaining players
(Mayfield, Ketchum, Murphy, and Burke had busted out while
I was covering the Deuce) were roughly:
Seat |
Player |
Chips |
1 |
Mike Cox |
$66,000 |
2 |
Steve Kaufman |
$68,000 |
3 |
Phyllis Meyers |
$28,500 |
4 |
Jay Heimowitz |
$40,000 |
5 |
Gary Pollak |
$68,000 |
10 |
George Rodis |
$69,000 |
We were playing with $500 antes and $1,000-2,000 blinds,
putting $6,000 in dead money on the table. There had obviously
been quite a few hands played at the final table before
I arrived, but I started with number one at 9:15 p.m.
Kaufman, the rabbi who had made the final table in three
of the biggest events in the world this past year (the Big
One at the 2000 WSOP, the Big One at the U.S. Poker Championships
at the Taj, and the Big One at the WPO in Tunica), got in
trouble on hand six. Cox limped in from the button, with
Kaufman calling from the small blind and Meyers checking
from the big, giving us three-way action.
CLUB SHORTAGE SHORTS KAUFMAN
The flop came 2h-7c-Kd, Kaufman bet straight out for $6,000,
and Cox called. The 8c hit the turn, Kaufman bet another
$18,000, and Cox moved all-in, a raise of about $37,000.
Kaufman debated for a while, as a losing call would leave
him very short, but eventually he decided to call, and turned
over Kc-4c, top pair with a flush draw. Cox showed us Ks-Qh,
top pair with a better kicker, and when neither a club nor
a four hit the river, Kaufman was down to $7,200, and Cox
was our new chip leader.
We lost the Dead Sea Scroll scholar nine hands later, when
Cox made it $8,000 under the gun, and Kaufman called, leaving
only $3,400 in his stack. The flop came 3c-3s-Qc, Cox bet
Kaufman's last chips, and Steve called for the size of the
pot. Ac-10c for Cox, Ks-Jh for Kaufman, and the 2-4 finish
(Cox making an unnecessary flush) sent Steve out in sixth
place.
We lost Meyers, a lovely woman who is always a crowd favorite
on personality, and who is an attractive brunette with one
thin distinctive shock of gray hair, on hand 23 when she
moved her short stack all-in from the small blind, and Heimowitz
decided to call the $13,500 raise with Kd-Jc. Meyers had
been caught trying to steal some chips, as she could produce
only 10d-Jh, and the 7-Q-J-4-6 board sent her out fifth.
THE LADY WAS OUT, BUT CALLING WITH TWO LADIES WAS IN
On hand 37, Pollak raised it to $6,000 from the small blind,
and Rodis called from the big blind. The flop came 7s-9s-10d,
Pollak bet out $10,000, and Rodis moved all-in, a raise
of $45,000 more. Pollak considered for a few moments, and
called, turning over Qc-Qd. Rodis turned over 3s-6s, a flush
draw and gutshot straight draw, and the 3c on the turn added
yet more outs to Rodis' cause, but a queen fell on the river,
and Rodis exited fourth.
I estimated the chips at this point to be
Cox, $145,000
Pollak, $137,000
Heimowitz, $58,000
YOU GOT A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THAT?
|
"Cox
did something that I'd never seen before." |
|
|
Heimowitz, a five-time bracelet winner, didn't have enough
chips to be getting fancy, but Cox and Pollak were two big
kids who'd obviously studied at two different schools of
architecture and design. Pollak arranged his in one towering
wall of five stacks, while Cox did something that I'd never
seen before, putting his chips into three separate stacks,
on in front of him, one to his left, and the other to his
right.
Pollak thought this a bit odd, too, because he cracked,
"Are you opening branch offices?" when he saw
the arrangement.
Heimowitz's chip disadvantage grew worse on hand 47, when
Pollak opened for $9,000 on the button, and Jay re-raised
$15,000 from the big blind, an odd amount because it almost
begged for a call. If he'd raised that much at me, I'd have
been confused as to whether it signaled either weakness
or great strength, which I guess was the idea. Pollak called.
SUPPERTIME FOR POLLAK
The flop came Ac-Kh-4d, Jay bet out $21,000, and Pollak,
looking very much like a lion gazing out at herd of fat
young wildebeests that all had broken legs, asked how much
more Jay had left. It was only about $10,000, and Pollak
moved in. Heimowitz mucked instantly, not wanting to play
the role of dinner, but he was painfully short on chips,
and six hands later, when the clock went off to send us
to the next level ($700 antes, $1,500-3,000 blinds), I estimated
the chips at
Pollak, $200,000
Cox, $120,000
Heimowitz, $20,000
Jay picked up a few chips over the next ten hands, but
not many; the action was cautious, with Heimowitz not wanting
to commit with a weak hand, and his opponents all-too-aware
of how dangerous a foe he would be if he could double up
once or twice.
We finally got some action when Cox limped in from the
button, with both opponents playing along for the minimum.
The flop came 5d-2d-3d, and Heimowitz bet $6,000. Pollak
gave a confident look and raised $30,000 more, but the look
must have looked as unconvincing to his foes as it did to
me, because Cox thought for a long time before folding his
hand, and Heimowitz decided to call for his last $20,000
with Kd-3c, middle pair and second-nut diamonds for back-up.
Cancel that back-up help, because Pollak turned over Ad-8s,
the nut flush draw, but no pairs yet. An ace, club, or eight
could have won for him, but the board finished 6h-3h, and
Heimowitz had more than $50,000.
"I KNOW YOU GOT ME, BUT I'M CALLING"
Heimowitz's stack started a slow decline again, and on
hand 75, he raised it to $6,000 from the small blind, with
Pollak calling from the big blind. The flop came 6d-4d-3s,
and Jay instantly moved in for his last $20,000. Pollak
said, "I know you have an overpair," but called
anyway with his 6-7, and his read turned out to be exactly
right, as Heimowitz turned over 7-7. The A-Q finish redoubled
Jay.
The hour was growing late, about 11:45, and Hale wanted
to go home, so we took a break so he could have three different
pictures taken, one with him presenting the bracelet to
each of the three remaining players, and his bases all covered,
Oklahoma Johnny departed.
Four hands after Hale left, his tournament heated up. Cox
made it $12,000 to go from the button, and Pollak re-raised
$25,000 more from the big blind. Cox moved in, and Pollak
called immediately, asking if Cox had aces. Cox snorted
and said no; I thought this question meant that Pollak had
kings, but he turned over something equally good for the
situation: A-K for Pollak, A-Q for Cox, and the 2-8-J-4-5
board left Cox a pauper at $21,300.
CAN ANYONE SAY "JOHN BONNETI AND GLEN COZEN?"
The two chip leaders had done just what they'd been trying
to avoid, a big confrontation while the third, short-stacked
player was still in the game, and now Heimowitz's $65,000
was looking pretty good for a shot at second place money,
with Pollak the chip monster at $255,000.
Pollak finished what he started three hands later, when
Cox moved in for a raise of $11,700 from the button, and
Pollak called from the big blind. This time Cox had the
A-K, and Pollak Qh-9h, but the board came 4-5h-J-7h-Kh,
and by losing to A-K and with A-K, Cox was out third virtually
at the stroke of midnight.
We started heads-up play with Pollak leading $280,000-$60,000,
and three hands in, Jay limped from the SBB, Pollak popped
it for $10,000 more, and Heimowitz called. The flop came
10h-10c-5c, Jay checked, Pollak bet $15,000, and Heimowitz
moved in, a raise, they counted, of $34,600 more.
POLLAK'S X-RAY VISION WORKS, SORT OF
Both men stood up as Pollak considered his next move. Pollak
stared so hard at Heimowitz I thought he was trying to bore
a hole through him, but Heimowitz just wandered off towards
the rail, and wiped his mouth with a handkerchief. I couldn't
decide if this was a tell, a reverse tell, or just something
Jay needed to do, but Pollak finally decided to call.
A-Q offsuit for Pollack, 9c-7c for Heimowitz. Pollak had
the lead, but Heimowitz had a flush draw. The 6d hit the
turn, and Pollak was one card from victory. The river card
hit, and Heimowitz had missed his flush.
He hadn't missed his hand, though, because the lowly seven
of spades gave Jay a pair, and complete new life with a
$135,000 stack compared to Pollak's $205,000. The guy with
the five bracelets but only $10,000 a few minutes ago suddenly
had a very real chance to win.
Heimowitz evened the stacks up five hands later, when Pollak
made it $12,000 to go from the SBB, and Jay called. The
flop came 4h-6d-Qh, Jay checked, Pollak bet $20,000, Heimowitz
raised $40,000 more, and Pollak let it go.
The stacks were almost exactly even seven hands later,
number 99 by my count, when Heimowitz made it $7,000 to
go from the SBB, Pollak raised $30,000, Jay moved all-in,
and Pollak called so fast, I figured him for something pretty
big.
ALERT THE MEDIA, ANDY WRONG FOR 4,567th TIME THIS YEAR
I figured wrong.
Heimowitz turned over Ah-Kc, and Pollak showed us Kd-Jd.
The flop came As-2c-6s, and when the 8d hit the turn, Pollak
had no outs; the concluding 9s was irrelevant. It took a
little while to count down the two stacks, but it turned
out that Jay Heimowitz had started the hand with about $2,000
more than Pollack, and Bud Man had his sixth World Series
bracelet.
|
"I'll
take the man who never loses." |
|
|
I entitled this piece "The Man Who Never Loses,"
because when Heimowitz had arrived at a final table a few
days ago, Poker Digest's Lee Munzer and I were handicapping
the field, and even though Heimowitz was short-chipped,
Munzer had said, "I'll take the man who never loses."
I knew he was talking about Heimowitz, who has an incredible
win rate once he gets to final tables, but Jay didn't get
there that day. Even Secretariat lost the Wood Memorial
Stakes.
TOO LEGIT TO QUIT
I asked The Man Who Never Loses if he always played a short
stack that well. "I've played a lot of short stacks,"
said the tall man with the still powerful handshake, "and
a lot of the secret is, you're relentless, you don't give
up. I'd been tired earlier, but I got a second wind after
a while. I got inspired, I guess, when I won two tournaments
back-to-back at Foxwood's not that long ago."
"Usually, I don't play a lot of tournaments outside
the Series," Heimowitz explained, "but I felt
like playing, and when I won back to back events, I thought,
'You know, maybe I have more stamina than I thought I did,'
because it takes a lot of stamina to win two events in a
row."
Jay would be the first guy to admit that it takes a little
luck, too, and but for that seven of spades on the river
a dozen hands earlier, Gary Pollack would be wearing a bracelet
right now. When you're up against The Man Who Never Loses,
though, you better never look at him like he's dinner. Jay
Heimowitz has a lot more wild beast in him than wildebeest.
I'd been a little worried about a bracelet being awarded
in a non-open field, but it's hard to imagine a more fitting
winner for the Seniors inaugural visit to the World Series
of Poker.
Final Official Results, $1,000 Buy-in No-Limit Hold'em
Senior's Championship:
340 Entrants, $1,000 Buy-in, Total Prize Pool $329,800
1. Jay Heimowitz, $115,430
2. Gary Pollak, $62,000
3. Mike Cox, $31,330
4. George Rodis, $19,790
5. Phyllis Meyers, $14,835
6. Steve Kaufman, $11,540
7. Scott Mayfield, $8,245
8. Norm Ketchum, $6,590
9. Larry Murphy, $5,275
10. Pat Burke, $3,500
11th-12th, $3,960 each: Vic Markarian, Maureen Feduniak
13th-15th, $3,295 each: Chuck Thompson, Bob Feduniak, Jamie
Ligator.
16th-20th, $2,640 each: Michael Ross, Jack Duncan, C.B Trujillo,
Charles Sharp, Donald Pennington.
21st-30th, $1,980 each: Robert Bruce Atkinson, Chris Bigler,
Nicholas Partenope, Frank Okasaki, Jr., Susie Isaacs, Frankie
Knight, William Fain, Fred Bowden, Barbara Enright, Marsha
Waggoner.
Andrew N.S. Glazer, Editor
Wednesday Nite Poker
For more information on this newsletter read "What
to Expect from Wednesday Nite Poker".
|
Come on and play, the
Pharaoh will make it your luckiest day!
Play for fun or for real, it's all here at Pharaoh's
Casino.
Go to www.pharaohscasino.com
|
|
To the Top |
COMMENTS
& CONTACT |
I love getting reader feedback and questions.
Don't be shy about disagreeing with anything you read in Wednesday
Nite Poker. If I decide you're right, readers will hear about
it (with attribution or without, as you prefer); if you're wrong,
you'll probably learn something important when you hear why
you're wrong.
Email me at: wednesdaynitepoker@casino.com
If you would like to read previous issues of Wednesday Nite
Poker you can find them here.
Interested in advertising in this newsletter? Contact us
at: ads@casino.com.
Wednesday Nite Poker is is published by the Casino.com Network
(http://www.casino.com)
twice a month. The Casino.com Network publishes other popular
newsletters; Craps Companion, Slots Report, Blackjack Insider,
Casino Travel Showcase, CasinoWire Newsletter, The Casino.com
Spin and Ask the Pro. If you wish to subscribe sign
up here!
If you wish to unsubscribe from
this newsletter please click
here.
|
To
the Top |
|
|
This is a special issue of WNP. Andrew N.S.
Glazer reports live from the WSOP - World Series of Poker Apr. 21
to May. 18. You will receive exclusive daily reports from the latest
and greatest event in the world of poker. |
|

|
|